19 Nov

Four big banks to be impacted by OSFI’s new capital requirements for negative amortization mortgages

General

Posted by: Dean Kimoto

Canada’s banking regulator recently confirmed it will move ahead with new capital requirements for lenders and insurers with negatively amortizing mortgage portfolios.

Starting in early 2024, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) will require lenders to hold more capital for negative amortization mortgage balances with loan-to-values (LTVs) above 65%.

  • What’s a negative amortization mortgage? Negative amortization can impact borrowers with fixed payment variable-rate mortgages in an environment when prime rate rises significantly, resulting in the borrower’s monthly payments not covering the full interest amount. This causes the mortgage to grow rather than shrink.

“We have updated several of our capital guidelines to promote prudent allocation of capital against risks that lenders and insurers take,” OSFI superintendent Peter Routledge said in a statement.

The changes were first announced by OSFI in July and were subject to a consultation period over the summer. They will primarily impact four of Canada’s big banks that currently offer fixed-payment variable rate mortgages: BMOCIBCRBC and TD.

For these banks, variable-rate mortgages comprise about a third of their overall portfolios (32%-39%), with roughly a quarter of those mortgages with extended amortizations beyond 30 years—or some $277 billion as of July, according to data from Fitch Ratings.

Scotiabank and National Bank of Canada, on the other hand, offer adjustable-rate mortgages where the borrower’s monthly payment fluctuates as prime rate changes. As a result, both banks have less than 1% of their variable-rate portfolios with amortizations above 30 years.

The new requirements will also impact Canada’s three mortgage insurers, which insure between 20% and 30% of all mortgages. Also effective in January, the maximum LTV ratio for individual mortgages in the Mortgage Insurer Capital Adequacy Test (MICAT) capital formula will increase from 100% to 105%. This adjustment aligns the MICAT capital formula with the maximum permitted LTV ratio for insured mortgages.

The new guidelines also set a limit of 40 years on the mortgage’s remaining amortization length for the purpose of calculating regulatory capital.

“Given the relatively low prevalence of negative equity mortgages, the overall impact for mortgage insurers is expected to be minimal, resulting in an immaterial decline in the capital ratio,” DBRS Morningstar noted in a report.

“Our expectation is that underwriting profitability will weaken somewhat but be manageable from a credit quality perspective given mortgage insurers’ strong capital buffers and conservative credit underwriting criteria,” the report added.

Impact on banks to be manageable, Fitch says

In its own report, Fitch said the Capital Adequacy Requirements (CAR) for the banks are likely to be “comfortably absorbed.”

The ratings agency said the changes should impact common equity tier 1 (CET1) ratios by only 7 to 22 basis points, “or less than 2% of the average 3Q23 13.5% CET1 capital for the four banks with exposure,” it said. “As of 3Q23, all banks had CET1 ratios comfortably above regulatory minimums.”

OSFI’s reasoning for cracking down on fixed payment variable-rate mortgages

OSFI has repeatedly voiced its concerns about fixed payment variable-rate mortgages, first singling them out in its Annual Risk Outlook for 2023-2024.

Most recently, during testimony before the Standing Senate Committee on Banking, Commerce and the Economy earlier this month, Routledge said increasing mortgage balances associated with negative amortization “increases their vulnerability, and increases the risk of default.”

“The variable rate product with fixed payments is a dangerous product in our view because it puts the homeowner in the position of an extended extended period—not always, but in this environment certainly—it can put the homeowner in the position of paying a flat rate of, say, $2,000 a month, and the interest on their mortgage is $3,000 a month,” Routledge said.

And while Routledge said OSFI’s role is not to “impose a judgment on product design,” he did say OSFI would “like less of that product.”

In response to stakeholder feedback on these new capital requirements that the implementation timeframe is “very tight,” OSFI responded by saying it was important to “address the risk in a timely manner.” As such, the new capital requirements will take effect in fiscal Q1.

 

This article was written for Canadian Mortgage Trends by:

14 Nov

Rent prices are up $175 in the past six months and have pushed rent inflation to a 30-year high

General

Posted by: Dean Kimoto

The average asking rent in Canada has increased by about $175 over the past six months, and is now nearly 10% higher compared to a year ago.

As of October, the average rent price for all unit types reached $2,178, according to data from Rentals.ca‘s latest monthly data. That’s up 1.4% compared to September, but slower than the 1.8% monthly increase seen back in August thanks to seasonable factors.

One-bedroom rent prices were up a whopping 29% year-over-year in Red Deer, Alberta, while Halifax, NS (+20.6%) and Markham, ON (+20%) also saw outsized gains.

The national average rent for two-bedroom units has now surpassed $2,300 a month, up 1.7% from September and +11.7% compared to a year ago. The largest increases were seen in Oakville, ON (+23.5%) and Quebec City, QC (+17.6%).

High rents are contributing to inflation

Average rents in Canada are now up over 31% compared to the low of $1,662 reached in April 2021.

This steep rise means rent prices are now a leading contributor to the country’s headline inflation rate, which the Bank of Canada is desperately trying to bring back to its target rate of 2%.

As of September, rent inflation has shot up to 7.3%, according to data from Statistics Canada—the fastest pace since 1983. It’s now the second leading contributor to overall inflation, after mortgage interest cost, which is up 30.6%.

On a monthly basis, rent inflation from August to September was 0.8%. That means that of the headline CPI inflation reading of 3.8% in September, 0.8% came from rent inflation alone. Another 2.6% came from mortgage interest cost.

“It’s a big issue,” noted analyst Ben Rabidoux of Edge Realty Analytics. He pointed to the more than 700,000 non-permanent residents added to the population over the past 12 months—which includes international students and foreign workers—as a major contributing factor to the upward pressure on rent prices.

In response to housing affordability concerns, the federal government recently announced it plans to level out its targets for new permanent residents coming to Canada. The target for 2024 and 2025 will increase as planned to 485,000 and 500,00, respectively, and hold steady at 500,000 in 2026.

“These immigration levels will help set the pace of Canada’s economic and population growth while moderating its impact on critical systems such as infrastructure and housing,” Immigration Minister Marc Miller said.

Alberta leads the provinces in rent price growth

Rentals.ca reported that Alberta once again posted the fastest year-over-year increase in rent prices, which were up 16.4% in October to $1,686.

Rents were also up sharply in Nova Scotia (+13.6%) and Quebec (13.3%), thanks to both strong population growth and “large infusions of new rental supply priced at above-average market rents,” Rentals.ca noted.

The slowest annual increases were once again seen in Manitoba (+5.5%) and Saskatchewan (+4%).

Calgary and Montreal lead rent growth in Canada’s largest cities

Calgary continued to lead rent price growth in October, with an average year-over-year increase of 14.7% to reach $2,093. Montreal saw the second-fastest pace of growth at 10.8%, with an average price of $2,046.

Here’s a look at the year-over-year rent increases in some of the country’s key markets:

    • Calgary, AB: +14.7% ($2,093)
    • Regina, SK: +13.7% ($1,273)
    • Montreal, QC: +10.8% ($2,046)
    • Ottawa, ON: +10.6% ($2,197)
    • Halifax, NS: +9.5% ($2,017)
    • Winnipeg, MB: +7.4% ($1,521)
    • Vancouver, B.C.: +4.4% ($3,215)
    • Toronto, ON: -0.8% ($2,908)

 

This article was written for Canadian Mortgage Trends by:

23 Oct

OSFI shelves some of its regulatory proposals in response to stakeholder feedback

General

Posted by: Dean Kimoto

Canada’s banking regulator confirmed today that it will no longer pursue at least several of the proposed mortgage regulations it had introduced earlier this year after they were met with widespread concern and criticism during its public consultation period.

Nine months after the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) unveiled its proposed measure related to debt serviceability and kicked off a public consultation period, the regulator today released the results of its discussions with industry stakeholders.

“The majority of stakeholders agreed that risks to lenders arising from high household indebtedness are important,” OSFI concluded in a report published today. “However, stakeholders were generally not supportive of additional debt serviceability measures.”

Respondents warned that OSFI’s latest proposed measures would have a disproportionate effect on smaller institutions with unique business models and wouldn’t adequately address the root cause of Canada’s household debt problem.

However, OSFI confirmed that it would no longer pursue two of its proposals at this time: debt-to-income (DTI) restrictions (while keeping LTI restrictions on the table) and debt service loan coverage restrictions.

While these comments were included in OSFI’s consultation feedback report, it hasn’t yet made final decisions in terms of the implementation of its remaining proposals.

In January, OSFI asked the public for feedback on three new regulatory changes to Guideline B-20 which were intended to restrict mortgage lending in response to record levels of household indebtedness.

Stakeholders expressed concerns over the proposed changes

The proposals included loan-to-income (LTI) and debt-to-income (DTI) restrictions, debt service coverage restrictions and more “risk-sensitive” interest rate affordability stress tests.

The following is the feedback OSFI received in response to each proposal.

Loan-to-income (LTI) and debt-to-income (DTI) restrictions

Specifically, the proposed LTI and DTI restrictions would limit lenders to a certain volume of loans that exceed a “prudent” threshold “to help financial institutions better manage the risks associated with significant buildups of household debt in their loan books,” according to OSFI’s Annual Risk Outlook semi-annual update. This would effectively cap 75% of all mortgage customers to loan amounts of up to 450% of their income.

According to the feedback published on Monday, respondents were generally not supportive of the measure, suggesting some would be redundant, too late to implement effectively and would disproportionately impact smaller lenders.

OSFI’s response:

“We consider a DTI (total indebtedness) restriction to be too complex to implement at this time,” it said in the report.

“We agree that debt service ratios (i.e., GDS and TDS), under certain conditions, can produce similar outcomes to LTI/DTI although they are focused on debt affordability as opposed to limiting exposure to high indebtedness. We also acknowledge that most lenders do not use LTI/DTI measures in underwriting,” it added. “We also believe proportional implementation, versus a one-size-fits-all approach, would be most appropriate given differences in FRFIs’ business models.”

“We appreciated lenders’ analysis on predictors of default and agree that credit score and other factors can be better predictors than high LTI or DTI,” OSFI noted. “That said, high household indebtedness is still relevant to credit risk, the safety and soundness of FRFIs, and the overall stability of the financial system.”

Debt-service coverage restrictions

This would involve measures that restrict ongoing debt service (principal, interest and other related expenses) obligations as a percentage of borrower income.

Respondents expressed “mixed views,” with some supporting a qualifying amortization limit but most expressing opposition to regulatory limits and alignment with insured mortgage criteria. Instead, the feedback found strong support to preserve the lender-determined risk-based limits and criteria for debt service coverage.

OSFI’s response:

“We believe there is merit in lenders applying an explicit, qualifying amortization limit and we will continue to evaluate this proposal,” OSFI said. “Such a limit would add more rigour to qualifying debt service calculations while still permitting lenders flexibility to offer a longer contractual amortization to some qualified borrowers.”

However, OSFI added that “After careful consideration of stakeholder feedback, we agree that regulatory limits on debt service coverage should not be pursued. While such limits could result in greater consistency, they would remove too much risk-based decision-making and risk ownership from lenders.

Interest rate affordability stress test

This measure would impose a more “risk-sensitive” test beyond the current Minimum Qualifying Rate (currently 5.25%), including implementing different MRQs for different product types, such as mortgage terms.

Respondents were similarly opposed to MQR adaptations and other affordability tests, specifically due to the negative effect on other public policy objectives and concerns over unintended consequences.

OSFI adds that any regulatory measures it considers would be implemented “incrementally and sequentially” with debt service coverage measures taking the priority, followed by adjustments to the MRQ, with an LTI limit as a last resort.

OSFI’s response:

“We will continue to reflect on how best to encourage lenders to apply more rigorous affordability tests, especially when higher risk attributes are present in a mortgage application. We should be able to observe variation in qualifying debt service ratios as evidence of this,” OSFI said.

“Encouraging longer borrowing terms and payment stability through MQR design has merit from a risk perspective.”

Other feedback

In addition to feedback specifically on the three proposals, respondents also commented on the importance of improved income verification in deterring mortgage misrepresentation.

They suggested that OSFI could work with the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) to allow independent income verification, something Mortgage Professionals Canada has identified as a priority as part of its advocacy initiatives.

“We welcome any initiative that advances our B-20 expectation that FRFIs use income sources that are independently verifiable and difficult to falsify. We and our federal financial sector partners are aware of ongoing CRA efforts in this regard,” OSFI said.

Respondents also encouraged a focus on higher risk markets like the Greater Toronto and Vancouver markets, though OSFI said it’s against any geography-based measures, as vulnerabilities and risks are common regardless of geography.

At the end of the day, OSFI agrees with other industry watchers in acknowledging the only real way to address Canada’s housing affordability crisis is by addressing supply shortages.

“We believe that housing market imbalances are driven by both demand and supply-side factors,” the report states. “Adequate housing supply that keeps pace with demographic needs supports a stable, well-functioning mortgage market and the broader Canadian economy.”

13 Oct

Residential Mortgage Commentary – Positive housing market sentiment

General

Posted by: Dean Kimoto

An interesting new survey suggests a growing number of Canadians may be getting ready to move back into the housing market.

The newly launched survey by Dye and Durham indicates one in ten are looking to sell their primary residence and move into a new one within the next 12 months; double the number who made the move in the past year.

The number of respondents planning to expand their holdings is also up significantly with 8.0% saying they intend to buy an investment property or vacation home in the next year.  That is nearly double the 5.0% who did so in the past year.  First-time buying decisions are also getting stronger.  Eight percent of respondents expect to jump into the market, up from 4.0% who actually made a purchase in the last 12 months.

The sidelines of the housing market will still be crowded though.  The survey suggests 23% of Canadians will bide their time until interest rates come down.  Nearly a quarter (24%) say they are waiting for prices to ease.

A separate survey of people who have bought a home in the last 4 years (by a popular real estate marketplace) shows that the buying decisions of 93% of respondents were influenced by rising interest rates and competitive markets.  At the same time 43% said they wanted to buy before prices increased further.

Nearly a third (30%) of the respondents say their finances are tight right now, with 10% saying they are unable to meet basic needs.  Still, they do not regret their purchase with 45% saying they will still be happy even if there is another interest rate increase this year.

This article was written by First National’s marketing team.

15 Sep

Recent rate hikes continue to slow housing activity in Canada’s largest cities

General

Posted by: Dean Kimoto

Housing markets in the country’s largest markets continued to moderate in August, following the Bank of Canada’s recent interest rate hikes over the summer.

What began as a strong spring housing rally has since cooled with more balanced conditions in most markets.

In the Greater Toronto Area, the country’s largest housing market, both prices and sales were little-changed compared to July, while sales are down 5.2% compared to last year and prices just marginally higher.

“Market results…show demand-supply conditions continuing to ease significantly in Vancouver, the Fraser Valley, Toronto and Hamilton,” noted RBC’s Robert Hogue. “Consistent with rebalancing trends, there’s growing evidence this spring’s price rally is running out of steam in Ontario and B.C.”

Continued strength in Alberta

There were some marked differences between regions, however, with greater activity seen in Alberta’s biggest housing markets.

In contrast to slowing activity in places like Vancouver, Toronto and Hamilton, “momentum appears to have persisted in Calgary and Edmonton, likely buoyed by outsized population gains and a relatively strong provincial labour market,” noted Randall Bartlett, Senior Director of Canadian Economics at Desjardins.

However, he adds it’s important to watch the trend with new listings, which have shown a “significant and broad-based rise” in recent months. Unlike the demand-supply tightness seen earlier in the year, and which drove price gains, Bartlett says the rising inventory suggests a “shift in market sentiment.”

“Continuation of this trend would mean more far less sanguine prospects for home values going forward,” he says.

Hogue adds that elevated interest rates, ongoing affordability issues and a looming recession are poised to pose “major obstacles” to the housing market recovery.

“Any material acceleration in the recovery will have to wait until interest rates come down in 2024,” he wrote.

Regional housing market roundup

Here’s a look at the August statistics from some of the country’s largest regional real estate boards:

QUICK LINKS:

*********

Greater Toronto Area

August 2023 YoY % Change
Sales 5,294 -5.2%
Benchmark price (all housing types) $1,082,496 +0.3%
New listings 12,296 +16.2%
Active listings 15,497 +16.5%

“More balanced market conditions this summer compared to the tighter spring market resulted in selling prices hovering at last year’s levels and dipping slightly compared to July,” said TRREB chief market analyst Jason Mercer.

“As interest rates continued to increase in May, after a pause in the winter and early spring, many buyers have had to adjust their offers in order to qualify for higher
monthly payments,” he added. “Not all sellers have chosen to take lower than expected selling prices, resulting in fewer sales.”

Source: Toronto Regional Real Estate Board (TRREB)


Greater Vancouver Area

August 2023 YoY % Change
Sales 2,296 +21.4%
Benchmark price (all housing types) $1,208,400 +2.5%
New listings 4,649 +17%
Active listings 10,082 -0.2%

“Borrowing costs are fluctuating around the highest levels we’ve seen in over 10 years, yet Metro Vancouver’s housing market bucked many pundits’ predictions of a major slowdown, instead posting relatively strong sales numbers and year-to-date price gains north of 8%, regardless of home type,” said Andrew Lis, REBGV Director of Economics and Data Analytics.

“As fall approaches, sales have caught up with the price gains, but both metrics are now slowing to a pace that is more in-line with historical seasonal patterns, and with what one might expect given that borrowing costs are where they are,” he added.

Source: Real Estate Board of Greater Vancouver (REBGV)


Montreal Census Metropolitan Area

August 2023 YoY % Change
Sales 2,753 +4%
Median Price (single-family detached) $561,000 +7%
Median Price (condo) $393,000 +2%
New listings 4,864 -4%
Active listings 15,159 +14%

“August is usually one of the least active months of the year. While August 2023 is no exception to the rule, the number of sales is in line with the historical average,” said Charles Brant, Director of the QPAREB’s Market Analysis Department.

“It is interesting to note that prices have not only recovered lost ground compared to the same period last year but are also maintaining levels close to the peak of 2022,” he added. “In a context where interest rates and prices both remain at high levels, a potential deterioration of the job market in the coming months could make this market stabilization more precarious.”

Source: Quebec Professional Association of Real Estate Brokers (QPAREB)

Calgary

Calgary housing statistics
August 2023 YoY % Change
Sales 2,729 +27.9%
Benchmark price (all housing types) $570,700 +7.9%
New listings 3,131 +15.2%
Active listings 3,254 -32%

“Higher lending rates have caused many buyers to either hold off on purchase decisions or shift toward more affordable products on the market,” said CREB Chief Economist Ann-Marie Lurie.

“The challenge has been the availability of supply, especially in the detached market,” she added. “Inventory levels hit record lows in August, and while new listings are higher than last year, conditions continue to favour the seller, driving further price gains.”

Source: Calgary Real Estate Board (CREB)


Ottawa

August 2023 YoY % Change
Sales 1,196 +6%
Average Price (residential property) $709,739 +0.5%
Average Price (condominium) $425,968 +1%
New listings 2,228 +7%

“Sales activity was up marginally on a year-over-year basis in August but remained well below the historical average for this time of year,” said OREB President Ken Dekker.

“There is no shortage of demand given increased immigration and the large Canadian population cohort entering the market,” he added. “The lack of suitable, affordable housing is a hindrance. High borrowing costs and economic uncertainty are impacting both sellers and buyers, which we expect will continue to result in further market fluctuations.”

Source: Ottawa Real Estate Board (OREB)

This article was written for Canadian Mortgage Trends by:
28 Aug

Long-term view shows Toronto and Vancouver home prices remain elevated despite recent declines

General

Posted by: Dean Kimoto

Despite detached home prices in Toronto and Vancouver posting year-over-year declines in the first half of the year, a longer-term view shows prices are still elevated, and in many cases higher compared to two or three years ago.

In its Hot Pocket Communities Report released Tuesday, RE/MAX found that detached homes in nearly 93% of the 82 districts it analyzed in both cities—which included downtown neighbourhoods and exurbs—were cheaper in the first half of 2023 compared to the previous year.

The exact amount varied between as little as 1.5% in West Vancouver to a whopping 25.6% in the Toronto exurb of Brock.

“Anxious homebuyers were quick to identify the bottom of the market and jumped in with both feet in the second quarter of the year,” Christopher Alexander, president of RE/MAX Canada, said in a statement.

RE/MAX said the easing of home prices was the biggest driver of buying activity in the first half of 2023, especially for existing homebuyers looking to upgrade their current residence.

Home prices remain elevated from a historical context

However, historical RE/MAX data show that despite the recent price drops, valuations remain on par with—or still above—pre- and early-pandemic prices.

In Toronto, prices in the district encompassing the Don Valley Village and Henry Farm neighbourhoods—among the cheapest in the downtown core—dropped by 10.8% to nearly $2 million in 2023. In the previous year, prices in the district had jumped by 17.4%, from $1.87 million to $2.1 million.

Vancouver East saw an 8.1% price drop in 2023, but that followed last year’s whopping 17.3% price gain.

And when it comes to towns outside of Toronto and Vancouver, the situation is even more stark.

In the Whistler/Pemberton area, outside of Vancouver, detached home prices declined 24.8% between 2022 and 2023, according to RE/MAX data. However, they also rose by 39.3% the previous year, more than cancelling out any benefits from this year.

Detached home prices in Orangeville, outside of Toronto, dropped by 14.3% in 2023, but they had shot up 26.47% the previous year.

In other words, prices for detached homes in these neighbourhoods largely haven’t declined over time.

“When we start to compare them over three years, we see virtually no price reduction because of what pricing was in 2020-2021 to where it is today,” Elton Ash, executive vice-president of RE/MAX Canada, told CMT in an interview. “Ultimately, if you purchased a home prior to 2020 and you sell today, you’re likely going to sell for higher than what you paid for it.”

The impact of higher rates and low supply

RE/MAX cites a lack of housing supply as the largest factor driving affordability issues today.

It says that nine out of the 16 districts it surveyed reported inventory shortages. This included the Gulf Islands and Whistler/Pemberton, where new listings are down by nearly 43% and 23%, respectively.

Ash says homebuilders are slowing their construction projects largely because of higher interest rates, inflation and uncertainty around carrying costs, not to mention buyer uncertainty.

Potential buyers are staying in their homes unless they absolutely need to move, which then reduces demand for new houses to be built. “That then becomes a self-fulfilling cycle,” Ash says. “You can’t get increased inventory if people just aren’t going to move.”

But the housing inventory shortage isn’t new. In 2022, the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) concluded that developers would need to build 3.5 million more housing units by 2030 than they normally would to make housing more affordable for the average Canadian buyer.

Ultimately, Ash doesn’t see housing affordability relief in the near term for prospective buyers looking to buy in the greater Toronto or Vancouver markets.

Where the housing market goes from here

With interest rates at historic highs, and the potential for them to rise further, Ash says he expects the market to be muted throughout the winter. But he doesn’t expect that will last.

Assuming interest rates remain under control and the Bank of Canada doesn’t increase interest rates beyond September, Ash expects the spring of 2024 to be a repeat of last spring.

Pent-up demand and higher buyer confidence, along with a stable interest rate environment, could see a return to 2023’s market conditions, he says. That ultimately means higher overall house prices, especially if developers don’t pick up the pace—and anything they do start this year won’t be ready for some time.

“I don’t see inventory increasing a great deal,” Ash says. “I do see buyer demand increasing. So, therefore, pricing will start to edge up next spring.”

 

This article was written for Canadian Mortgage Trends by:

23 Aug

Opinion: How to bridge the housing affordability gap for a generation without a home

General

Posted by: Dean Kimoto

Over the next few days, the new federal cabinet will gather in P.E.I. for their summer retreat. This is their first opportunity to get together and set priorities ahead of the return to Parliament in mid-September.

As they work to address the pressing issues of “making life more affordable” and “building more housing,” we ask that they keep front of mind how their decisions will impact an entire generation of Canadians and their dream of homeownership.

The demographics of Canadians impacted by the rising cost of housing have shifted recently. It now includes young middle-class professionals and young dual-income families living and working in urban centres. These are groups that in previous generations would be buying their first home but are now unable to do so.

It is not that the dream of homeownership is just further down the line, but that it feels completely unattainable.

A growing sense of hopelessness

Talking to peers in Vancouver, Calgary, Toronto and Ottawa, there is a shared sense of hopelessness in seeing a path to owning a home. It is a national issue where there is opportunity for the federal government to take a leading and convening role. It is encouraging to see a new housing minister in Sean Fraser and a renewed focus on addressing housing affordability.

Urban millennials are a key voter demographic that the Liberals have looked to over the past eight years and undoubtedly will in the next election. The current state of disillusionment and apathy within this group is palpable when it comes to housing affordability.

These sentiments can have the power to keep voters home on election day or even drive some to a populist alternative.

Whether it is record-high home prices leading to an insurmountable down payment or two additional interest hikes this summer further increasing mortgage costs, housing has not been this expensive in recent memory. Higher mortgage costs have been a key contributor to Canada’s stubborn inflation, with an increase from June’s 2.8% to 3.3% in July.

At the same time, rents are up significantly, eating into potential savings for a first home. The average monthly rent for a one-bedroom in Toronto is now more than $2,600 a month, up over 11% from last year. Vancouver is averaging $3,000. Even in Calgary, which traditionally has been immune to the high housing costs, one-bedroom rent is now at $1,800 a month, up 18% year-over-year.

Market conditions as they are mean that unless you have wealthy parents or an inheritance to help with a down payment, there is little hope of getting into a home, townhouse or even a one-bedroom condo.

Potential solutions

So, what can be done? One possible measure is a commitment from the most recent Liberal election platform, which is also supported by their opposition across the floor.

The federal government could increase the insured mortgage cut-off from $1 million to $1.25 million, and index it to inflation to better reflect today’s housing prices.

Why is this relevant? The average price of a home in the country’s largest centres, both in Greater Vancouver and Toronto, is now over $1.1 million. Any home over $1 million does not qualify for mortgage insurance and therefore requires a 20% down payment. Enacting this platform commitment would help more first-time homebuyers to afford a down payment.

In recent public opinion polling from Abacus Data measuring the top three issues facing Canadians, housing affordability and accessibility ranked third, ahead of the economy, and following only the rising cost of living and healthcare.

The government has the opportunity to reflect an understanding of the pressure the current market and economic conditions are putting on young Canadians hoping to buy a home someday and establish their lives.

Policies and messaging can benefit from empathizing with those millennials feeling this in their everyday lives.

This was written for Canadian Mortgage Trends by:

 

21 Aug

Choosing Your Ideal Payment Frequency

General

Posted by: Dean Kimoto

Your payment schedule is the frequency that you make mortgage payments and ranges from monthly to bi-monthly, bi-weekly, accelerated bi-weekly or even weekly payments. Below is a quick overview of what each of these payment frequencies mean:

Monthly Payments: A monthly payment is simply a single large payment, paid once per month; this is the default that sets your amortization. A 25-year mortgage, paid monthly, will take 25 years to pay off but includes the added burden of one larger payment coming from one employment pay period. With this payment frequency, you make 12 payments per year.

Example: $750k mortgage, 3-year fixed rate, 5.34%, 30-year amortization you would have a monthly payment of $4,156.19. No term savings; no amortization savings.

Bi-Weekly Payments: A bi-weekly mortgage payment is a total of 26 payments per year, calculated by multiplying your monthly mortgage payment by 12 months and divided by the 26 pay periods.

Example: $750k mortgage, 3-year fixed rate, 5.34%, 30-year amortization you would have a bi-weekly payment of $1,915.98 with term savings of $177 and total amortization savings of $1,769.

Accelerated Bi-Weekly Payments: An accelerated bi-weekly mortgage payment is also 26 payments per year, but the payment amount is higher than a regular bi-weekly payment frequency (take the monthly payment, divide by two, then multipy by 26.  Compared to regular bi-weekly this adds two extra bi-weekly payments per year). Opting for an accelerated bi-weekly payment will not only pay your mortgage off quicker, but it’s guaranteed to save you a significant amount of money over the term of your mortgage. This frequency also allows the mortgage payment to be split up into smaller payments vs a single, larger payment per month. This is especially ideal for households who get paid every two weeks as the reduction in cash flow is more on track with incoming income.

Example: $750k mortgage, 3-year fixed rate, 5.34%, 30-year amortization you would have accelerated bi-weekly payments of $2,078.10 with term savings of $1,217 and total amortization savings of $145,184. Plus, you would save 4 years, 12 months of payments by reducing scheduled amortization.

Weekly Payments: Similar to monthly payments, your weekly mortgage payment frequency is calculated by multiplying your monthly mortgage payment by 12 months and dividing by 52 weeks in a year. In this case, you would make 52 payments a year on your mortgage.

Example: $750k mortgage, 3-year fixed rate, 5.34%, 30-year amortization you would have weekly payments of $957.50 with term savings of $253 and total amortization savings of $2,526. You can move to accelerated weekly payments to save even more!

Prepayment Privileges: In addition to fine-tuning your payment schedule, most mortgage products include prepayment privileges that enable you to pay up to 20% of the principal (the true value of your mortgage minus the interest payments) per calendar year. This can help reduce your amortization period (the length of your mortgage).

By exercising your prepayment privileges, you can take time off your mortgage. For instance:

  • Extra $50 bi-weekly is $32,883 total savings and an additional 1 year, 2 months time saved
  • Extra $100 bi-weekly is $62,100 in total savings and an additional 2 years, 3 months time saved on your mortgage
  • Extra $200 bi-weekly is $111,850 in total savings and an additional 4 years, 1 month of time saved on your mortgage.

Understanding the different payment frequencies can be key in managing your monthly cash flow. If you’re struggling to meet a large payment, breaking it up can be effective; while the same can be true of the opposite. Individuals struggling to make a weekly or bi-weekly payment, may benefit from one monthly sum where they have time to collect the funds.

Contact a Dominion Lending Centres mortgage expert for more information or download our My Mortgage Toolbox app from Google Play or the Apple Store and check out the different payment calculators!

Published by my DLC Marketing Team.

17 Aug

Higher interest rates put a chill on Canada’s housing markets in July

General

Posted by: Dean Kimoto

Home sales and prices continued to ease in July following the two latest rate hikes from the Bank of Canada.

On a seasonally adjusted basis, home sales fell 0.7% from June to July, according to the latest monthly data from the Canadian Real Estate Association. This marks the first monthly contraction in six months.

While sales of existing homes were up in five of the 10 provinces, including Saskatchewan (+9%), Quebec (+5.1%) and Alberta (+4%), the declines in B.C. (-2.6%) and Ontario (-5.5%) were enough to reverse the upwards trend seen in recent months.

Calgary remained a notable exception, where home sales are up 9% since the Bank of Canada resumed its rate hikes.

“With the growing impact of interest rate hikes and our expectation for a slowing labour market, the real estate market could continue to lose momentum in the months ahead,” noted National Bank’s Daren King.

King added that the record demographic growth Canada is experiencing is helping to prevent a “significant” drop in sales.

National average price down 18% from peak

CREA reported that the national average home price (not seasonally adjusted) continued to fall in July to $668,754. While that’s up 6.3% compared to a year ago, it’s down over 18% from the peak reached in February 2022 of $816,720.

“Following a brief surge of activity in April, housing markets have settled down in recent months, with price growth now also moderating with its usual slight lag,” said Shaun Cathcart, CREA’s Senior Economist.

“Sales and price growth are already showing signs of tapering off further in August in response to the Bank of Canada’s mid-July rate hike and messaging regarding above-target inflation for longer than previously expected,” he added. “We’re probably looking at another round of ʻback to the sidelines’ for some buyers until there’s a higher level of certainty around interest rates going forward.”

Cross-country roundup of home prices

Here’s a look at select provincial and municipal average house prices as of July.

Location Average Price Annual price change
B.C. $966,181 +5.4%
Ontario $856,269 +3.2%
Quebec $492,190 +2.6%
Alberta $452,387 +4.1%
Manitoba $352,352 -0.3%
New Brunswick $292,300 -1.3%
Greater Vancouver $1,210,700 +0.5%
Greater Toronto $1,161,200 +1.3%
Victoria $887,900 -4.7%
Barrie & District $820,900 -4.8%
Ottawa $650,200 -3.1%
Calgary $551,300 +5.6%
Greater Montreal $520,000 -1.5%
Halifax-Dartmouth $529,900 +6.4%
Saskatoon $384,200 +0.3%
Edmonton $375,100 -6.2%
Winnipeg $347,200 -1.1%
St. John’s $332,800 +2.2%

*Some of the movements in the table above may be somewhat misleading since average prices simply take the total dollar value of sales in a month and divide it by the total number of units sold. The MLS Home Price Index, on the other hand, accounts for differences in house type and size and adjusts for seasonality.

Resale market is returning to balance

CREA also reported that the number of newly listed homes continued to increase for the fourth straight month, rising 5.6% from June. “Building on gains of 2.8% in April, 7.9% in May, and 5.9% in June, new listings have gone from a 20-year low in March to closer to (but still below) average levels by mid-summer,” CREA noted.

This caused the sales-to-new listings ratio to ease to 59.2%, down from 63% in June and a peak of 68% in April. Supply also ticked up to 3.1 months of inventory from 3 in June.

“With sales dipping and resale supply on the rise, markets are moving towards being more balanced,” said TD Economics’ Rishi Sondhi.

National Bank’s Daren King also pointed to a rise in cancelled listings in the month, which he said indicated a “loss of momentum in the real estate market.” He said it’s “a sign that some sellers are discouraged by recent interest rate hikes.”

Looking ahead, real estate markets are expected to face continued headwinds from elevated interest rates, even if the Bank of Canada remains on hold from here.

BMO’s Robert Kavcic notes that interest rates are likely to remain at current elevated levels into next year, which will continue to act as a headwind for the housing market.

 

This article was written for Canadian Mortgage Trends by:

14 Aug

Home Renovations – Reality vs. Television

General

Posted by: Dean Kimoto

Home Renovations – Reality vs. Television.

Watching home renovation shows is inspiring, often providing us with ideas for our own spaces. However, there is a bit of a downside when it comes to these shows – they can be misleading when it comes to the renovation process.

While we may want to recreate something from one of these shows, without knowing all of the ins and outs, you could be starting a project you’re not ready for! In order to sort out what is real and what is television magic, we have broken down some of the components that go along with a renovation.

Budget & Financing

When it comes to most home renovation shows, there is little to no discussion regarding finances. In reality, if you’re looking to renovate your home you would want to discuss with your mortgage broker or a mortgage expert from Dominion Lending Centres to determine your options.

Some of the ways that you can finance a renovation include:

  1. Mortgage Refinancing: This option will allow you to borrow up to 80% of your home’s appraised value (less any outstanding mortgage balance). Refinancing your mortgage (if approved) will provide you to access funds immediately and tends to have lower interest rates than a standard credit card or personal loan. This is best suited to large-scale renovations or remodels. You will want to refinance at the end of the mortgage term whenever possible to avoid breaking your mortgage and owing penalties.
  2. Purchase Plus Improvements Mortgage: This is a great option if you haven’t yet bought that home and will allow you to finance your renovation at the time of purchase. This type of mortgage is available to assist buyers with making simple upgrades, not conducting major renovations where structural modifications are made. Simple renovations include paint, flooring, windows, a hot-water tank, a new furnace, kitchen updates, bathroom updates, a new roof, basement finishing, and more. Depending on your mortgage, the Purchase Plus Improvements (PPI) product can allow you to borrow between 10% and 20% of the initial value for renovations.
  3. Financing Improvements Upon Purchase: Similarly to Purchase Plus Improvements, this option allows you to finance your renovation project at the time of a new purchase by adding the estimated costs to your mortgage with CMHC Mortgage Loan Insurance. You can obtain financing with only a 5% down payment for both the purchase of your home and the renovations for up to 95% of the value after renovations! Plus, there are no additional fees or premiums and you can earn added rebates for energy-saving renos.
  4. Line of Credit or Home Equity Loans: Lastly, you always have the option of utilizing a secured line of credit or home equity loan to pay for your renovation. Securing your renovation loan against the equity in your home can typically be up to 80% of the property value; accessible at any time. This will typically provide lower interest than non-secured financing and allows you to access funds at any time.

Once you have your source of renovation financing, you need to create a budget. On television, it is very hard to determine whether a renovation budget that is listed is accurate. In fact, in some cases the network or show itself even adds to the budget behind the scenes! As viewers, we are simply not aware of what has been factored into those numbers by the television producers such as design fees, permits, labour, material costs, promotional giveaways, etc.

Fortunately, when it comes to reality, you can easily create a realistic budget for your renovation by simply doing some research and requesting quotes. Working with a professional contractor in these cases is crucial to ensure all the work done is to code and to avoid any surprises down the line. A professional can also help you create a detailed budget and timeline for your project so you know what to expect. During all stages of the renovation from picking out paint and new tile to labour costs, be sure to consult your budget. You don’t want to be partway through your renovation only to find out that you’ve run out of money due to making changes or selecting more expensive materials!

Renovation Timeline

Perhaps one of the least realistic aspects of home renovation shows is the timeline. It can seem like just a few short weeks to re-do your entire kitchen, but in reality, that timeline is often stretched.

Working with your contractor to create a realistic timeline based on your goals will help make the process less stressful and ensure you know what you’re getting into BEFORE you start.

Keep in mind, just because you’re ready to renovate, that doesn’t mean a contractor will be available. You may also run into snags such as material shortages or other issues so keep that in mind when you are planning out your timeline.

Planning & Design

When it comes to home renovation television, there is often an interior designer who comes in and makes decisions without the clients; in reality, that is not the case. When it comes to a real-life renovation, all the changes would be well-documented and planned out in advance with the clients (or by the client). In addition, unlike television shows that don’t show certain aspects, you will need to ensure you get building permits and inspections done throughout your renovation. While it can be time-consuming, this is extra important to ensure that your renovation is legal and therefore covered by insurance should anything happen.

While doing a home renovation in real life is different from television, with the right planning and support team for financing and contracting, you can bring your vision to life! Contact your Dominion Lending Centres mortgage expert to get started.

Published by my DLC Marketing Team July 25, 2023