23 Jun

Residential Market Commentary – Renters retreat from the market

General

Posted by: Dean Kimoto

A key segment of Canada’s first-time homebuyer market appears to be delaying its purchasing plans.  A new survey by real estate giant Royal LePage suggests renters are holding back, waiting for further price declines.

The survey finds that 40% of renters, who considered buying before signing or renewing their current lease, are waiting for property prices to drop.  Another 29% are waiting for further interest rate reductions and 28% say they are continuing to rent while they save for a down payment.

The market has become more buyer friendly (prices are off their peaks, interest rates are down and supply is up) but affordability is a primary concern for renters.  Across Canada, 15% of tenants say they spend more than half of their net income on rent.  More than half of renters (53%) believe their income will not allow them to buy in their preferred neighbourhood.

Beyond the financial concerns, nearly a third of renters (31%) say they have no intention of buying.  Of that group, 40% say renting is more affordable, and another 40% simply do not want the responsibilities associated with homeownership.

At the same time rental costs, while still high, have been moderating.  One national analysis shows, average rent for a one-bedroom unit declined 3.6% year over year to $1,857 in May 2025.  Two-bedroom rents fell 4.6% to $2,225.

The survey suggests the desire for ownership remains strong with 54% of renters saying they intend to buy a home “in the future”.  Sixteen percent expect to make the move within the next two years, 21% are looking to buy in two to five years.

This article was published by the First National Financial Marketing Team.

16 Jun

Airbnb says thousands of B.C. reservations at risk, blaming ‘rushed’ rental rules

General

Posted by: Dean Kimoto

Short-term vacation rental platform Airbnb said Friday that “thousands” of reservations in British Columbia are at risk of cancellation, accusing the province of rushing out regulations as it cracked down on the industry.

Alex Howell, Airbnb’s Canadian policy lead, said in an interview that the rules requiring short-term rental hosts to confirm their listings are legal under the changes have already led to some bookings being cancelled.

The government has said platforms such as Airbnb can’t post B.C. listings without confirming their registration with the province, but Howell said many hosts whose properties qualify can’t register due to glitches and other problems with the new system.

“Typically, we would have worked with a government for six months to do live testing, to make sure that things are working the way they should,” Howell said.

“And unfortunately in this situation, B.C. really just rushed into launching the system that hadn’t been fully tested, and that’s what’s brought us to this situation.”

She said that property owners have reported that typos and formatting errors have prevented them from registering with the province, despite meeting all the legal criteria for hosting short-term rentals.

The province had said that short-term rentals are being restricted to principal residences, a secondary suite or a structure such as a laneway house on the property, and the policy is meant to open up more units in B.C.’s rental housing market.

Howell said the timing of B.C.’s latest rules on short-term rentals is especially impactful, just ahead of the busy summer tourist season.

“Thousands of reservations across the province are now at risk,” she said. “These are registered, compliant hosts that are failing validation protocols through no fault of their own.

“And this impacts … thousands of reservations across the province, at least 50 per cent of which are domestic travellers who are following their own government’s advice to support local and travel within Canada this year.”

Howell said instead of waiting until the June 23 deadline — when bookings on unregistered B.C. properties would be cancelled — Airbnb is proactively contacting affected hosts and guests to offer penalty-free cancellations.

“We think it’s irresponsible to wait until the 23rd to alert travellers that there might be an issue,” she said. “We’re trying to get them that information ahead of time so that they can make some informed decisions.”

In a statement, Housing Minister Ravi Kahlon said the province is confident that “Airbnb will find solutions to their challenges with getting listings verified ahead of the June 23 deadline.”

“We hope that Airbnb will choose to support their hosts in verifying their listings, instead of cancelling their bookings,” Kahlon said. “This is new ground for B.C., and we are working through ServiceBC, our short-term rental branch, and the platforms themselves to help hosts comply with the requirements.”

The ministry also noted that there are 65 short-term rental platforms operating in B.C., and other platforms have been successful in supporting their hosts to get registered.

In a separate statement, the Opposition B.C. Conservatives criticized the short-term rental policies of the New Democrat government, with Prince George-Valemount legislator Rosalyn Bird saying the regulations running counter to the province’s efforts to promote local travel.

“How do you promote staycations while sabotaging the short-term rental market that makes them possible in small towns?” Bird said in the statement. “The Premier (David Eby) says ‘travel within B.C.’, and then his government kneecaps our ability to welcome those travellers.”

This article was written for Canadian Mortgage Trends by Chuck Chiang.

13 Jun

The Wildfire Clause: What Mortgage Brokers Need to Know

Interest Rates

Posted by: Dean Kimoto

It’s been more than a year since the BC Financial Services Authority (BCFSA) introduced the optional wildfire clause for real estate transactions. With wildfire season upon us, now is the perfect time to refresh your understanding of how this clause helps manage risk in transactions.

How it works

The wildfire clause allows for a single extension of up to 30 days for completion, adjustment, and possession dates in a Contract of Purchase and Sale (CPS) if the buyer is unable to secure fire insurance due to an active wildfire. If the buyer secures insurance before the extension period ends, they must notify the seller, who may then accelerate closing.

Please note:

  • The clause does not automatically release the buyer from their contractual obligations — notably, they must prove they made reasonable efforts to obtain insurance.
  • The clause applies only to wildfires and excludes all other natural disasters (g. floods).

While buyers and sellers can modify the extension period, legal advice is recommended if extending beyond 30 days.

Finer details for brokers

The wildfire clause is an important legal safeguard for buyers to protect them from breach of contract. However, while the clause itself doesn’t directly affect rate approvals, it can delay mortgage funding, which can trigger serious consequences for borrowers.

Additionally, buyers must understand that this clause doesn’t shield them from certain financing complications. Specifically:

  • Many lenders require insurance before funding:
    If a buyer can’t secure insurance due to a nearby wildfire, the lender typically won’t release funds, even if the mortgage rate is already approved.
  • Delays may cause buyers to lose their rate hold:
    Many lenders will honour a rate hold for only 90 to 120 days. If closing is pushed beyond that window, the borrower may lose their rate and face higher interest costs or larger borrowing amounts, which could impact qualification for financing.
  • Reapproval might be necessary:
    If closing is delayed significantly, lenders may require new documentation or reassess the borrower’s financial profile.
  • Higher-risk properties may face financing challenges:
    Properties near wildfire zones may limit lender options or trigger additional requirements, such as larger down payments or insurance clauses.

Best practices for brokers

To support clients in wildfire-prone areas, brokers should:

  • Encourage early insurance coverage:
    Advise buyers to secure fire insurance as soon as possible.
  • Maintain documentation:
    Buyers should track communication with insurance brokers to demonstrate their attempts at securing coverage.
  • Highlight financial risks:
    Discuss potential delays, financing impacts, and related transaction risks.
  • Advise clients to seek legal guidance:
    The clause may affect additional property purchases and financing terms. As such, legal review is recommended.

Natural disaster relief options for borrowers

Beyond wildfire-related challenges, mortgage default insurers have reaffirmed financial relief options for borrowers impacted by natural disasters. Indeed, Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC), Sagen, and Canada Guaranty all offer payment deferrals of up to six months for affected homeowners. (For more, see “Natural Disaster Solutions Reaffirmed by All Three Default Insurers” by Robert McLister, published June 5, 2025, on MortgageLogic.News.)

These solutions provide breathing room for those facing temporary financial hardship due to events such as floods, wildfires, and other extreme weather conditions. While relief measures vary, borrowers should reach out to their lenders for guidance on available support.

This article was written for CMBA-BC on June 5, 2025.

10 Jun

GST relief on new homes could save 1st-time buyers up to $240 on mortgages: report

Latest News

Posted by: Dean Kimoto

The Liberal plan to give first-time homebuyers a tax break on a newly built home could have substantial impacts on housing affordability — with a few caveats — a new analysis finds.

The Liberal government introduced legislation on June 5 to eliminate the GST portion from new home sales of up to $1 million for first-time buyers, which works out to as much as $50,000 off the cost of a new build or a substantially renovated unit.

For homes sold above $1 million, the GST relief is phased out as the price tag nears $1.5 million.

Desjardins Economics said in a report released Monday that first-time Canadian homebuyers could save up to $240 on their monthly mortgage payments if they were to buy a new home with an all-in, tax-included price of $1 million. The required down payment would also be somewhat smaller.

Some developers charge the sales tax upfront, so it’s not rolled into the mortgage principal at the time of purchase.

“For these homes, eliminating the GST will help prospective buyers reduce upfront closing costs, helping them get their foot in the door sooner,” said the report, authored by Desjardins economist Kari Norman.

She argued the impact on housing affordability will be “particularly strong” for buyers in Canada’s more expensive markets, like Toronto and Vancouver, where homes are routinely priced above the $1-million mark.

The new policy takes a big step beyond the existing New Housing Rebate, which is open to more than just first-time buyers but has long been capped at homes priced up to $450,000.

Norman estimates that nearly 85% of new builds in Canada would quality for up to $50,000 GST relief in the new proposal.

Roughly 92% of new builds in Toronto are expected to qualify for full or partial tax relief for homes priced up to $1.5 million. Only 75% of new units in Vancouver would qualify, however, as many top out of the qualifying price range.

Desjardins recommends that the new policy index the price of qualifying homes to inflation to avoid future erosions in affordability.

The federal government predicts the GST rebate will cost about $3.9 billion over five years, while the parliamentary budget officer estimates the price tag is closer to $2 billion over the same time frame.

Desjardins said the discrepancy between the figures could indicate the federal government anticipates more new buyers taking advantage of the rebate, and a bigger boom in homebuying and construction as a result.

It’s possible that increased demand spurred by the policy also leads to a surge in new building in Canada, the report said.

The rebate also comes at a time when the Canadian construction industry faces serious obstacles to getting shovels in the ground: high financing and construction costs, regulatory delays, an aging workforce and uncertainty among buyers and builders tied to Canada’s trade war with the United States.

The report also warns that some developers, foreseeing increased buying power, could raise their own costs for materials and labour in response to the policy, which would undermine any gains in affordability.

Higher demand for housing tied to the GST break could, in the near-term, push up home prices if not coupled with other efforts to boost supply and the pace of construction, the report said.

This might be the ideal time to introduce a policy that stokes demand for new builds, however, as Desjardins noted a particularly soft condo market in cities such as Toronto could benefit from an increase in buyer appetite.

Parliament has yet to pass the legislation, which would apply to homes bought between May 27 through to 2031. Construction on qualifying homes would need to start before 2031 and finish by 2036.

The measure, one of a suite of proposals included in the Liberal platform during the spring federal election, is packaged in the same legislation as the promised income tax cut, which is set to take effect July 1.

This article was written for Canadian Mortgage Trends by Craig Lord.

4 Jun

Bank of Canada holds policy rate at 2¾%

Latest News

Posted by: Dean Kimoto

The Bank of Canada today maintained its target for the overnight rate at 2.75%, with the Bank Rate at 3% and the deposit rate at 2.70%.

Since the April Monetary Policy Report, the US administration has continued to increase and decrease various tariffs. China and the United States have stepped back from extremely high tariffs and bilateral trade negotiations have begun with a number of countries. However, the outcomes of these negotiations are highly uncertain, tariff rates are well above their levels at the beginning of 2025, and new trade actions are still being threatened. Uncertainty remains high.

While the global economy has shown resilience in recent months, this partly reflects a temporary surge in activity to get ahead of tariffs. In the United States, domestic demand remained relatively strong but higher imports pulled down first-quarter GDP. US inflation has ticked down but remains above 2%, with the price effects of tariffs still to come. In Europe, economic growth has been supported by exports, while defence spending is set to increase.  China’s economy has slowed as the effects of past fiscal support fade. More recently, high tariffs have begun to curtail Chinese exports to the US. Since the financial market turmoil in April, risk assets have largely recovered and volatility has diminished, although markets remain sensitive to US policy announcements. Oil prices have fluctuated but remain close to their levels at the time of the April MPR.

In Canada, economic growth in the first quarter came in at 2.2%, slightly stronger than the Bank had forecast, while the composition of GDP growth was largely as expected. The pull-forward of exports to the United States and inventory accumulation boosted activity, with final domestic demand roughly flat. Strong spending on machinery and equipment held up growth in business investment by more than expected. Consumption slowed from its very strong fourth-quarter pace, but continued to grow despite a large drop in consumer confidence. Housing activity was down, driven by a sharp contraction in resales. Government spending also declined. The labour market has weakened, particularly in trade-intensive sectors, and unemployment has risen to 6.9%. The economy is expected to be considerably weaker in the second quarter, with the strength in exports and inventories reversing and final domestic demand remaining subdued.

CPI inflation eased to 1.7% in April, as the elimination of the federal consumer carbon tax reduced inflation by 0.6 percentage points. Excluding taxes, inflation rose 2.3% in April, slightly stronger than the Bank had expected. The Bank’s preferred measures of core inflation, as well as other measures of underlying inflation, moved up. Recent surveys indicate that households continue to expect that tariffs will raise prices and many businesses say they intend to pass on the costs of higher tariffs. The Bank will be watching all these indicators closely to gauge how inflationary pressures are evolving.

With uncertainty about US tariffs still high, the Canadian economy softer but not sharply weaker, and some unexpected firmness in recent inflation data, Governing Council decided to hold the policy rate as we gain more information on US trade policy and its impacts. We will continue to assess the timing and strength of both the downward pressures on inflation from a weaker economy and the upward pressures on inflation from higher costs.

Governing Council is proceeding carefully, with particular attention to the risks and uncertainties facing the Canadian economy. These include: the extent to which higher US tariffs reduce demand for Canadian exports; how much this spills over into business investment, employment and household spending; how much and how quickly cost increases are passed on to consumer prices; and how inflation expectations evolve.

We are focused on ensuring that Canadians continue to have confidence in price stability through this period of global upheaval. We will support economic growth while ensuring inflation remains well controlled.

Information note

The next scheduled date for announcing the overnight rate target is July 30, 2025. The Bank will publish its next MPR at the same time.

This press release is from the Bank of Canada website.